Re: Synchronous replication
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronous replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C4037E6.1000300@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronous replication (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronous replication
Re: Synchronous replication |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 16/07/10 10:40, Fujii Masao wrote: > So we should always prevent the standby from applying any WAL in pg_xlog > unless walreceiver is in progress. That is, if there is no WAL available > in the archive, the standby ignores pg_xlog and starts walreceiver > process to request for WAL streaming. That completely defeats the purpose of storing streamed WAL in pg_xlog in the first place. The reason it's written and fsync'd to pg_xlog is that if the standby subsequently crashes, you can use the WAL from pg_xlog to reapply the WAL up to minRecoveryPoint. Otherwise you can't start up the standby anymore. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: