Re: performance on new linux box
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: performance on new linux box |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C35E4CA020000250003327E@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: performance on new linux box (Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: performance on new linux box
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Ryan Wexler <ryan@iridiumsuite.com> wrote: > One thing I don't understand is why BBU will result in a huge > performance gain. I thought BBU was all about power failures? Well, it makes it safe for the controller to consider the write complete as soon as it hits the RAM cache, rather than waiting for persistence to the disk itself. It can then schedule the writes in a manner which is efficient based on the physical medium. Something like this was probably happening on your non-server machines, but without BBU it was not actually safe. Server class machines tend to be more conservative about not losing your data, but without a RAID controller with BBU cache, that slows writes down to the speed of the rotating disks. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: