Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys
От | Richard Huxton |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C2B71BF.7020008@archonet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 30/06/10 17:11, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> My scintillating contribution to this discussion is the observation >>> that unrestorable dumps suck. >> >> No doubt, but is this a real problem in practice? > > Magnus tells me that that was what prompted his original email. I've done it. Luckily only with a small and fully functioning database so I could drop the constraint and re-dump it. Had a "recent_date" domain that was making sure new diary-style entries had a plausible date. Of course, two years later my dump can no longer restore the oldest record :-( IMHO The real solution would be something that could strip/rewrite the constraint on restore rather than trying to prevent people being stupid though. People *will* just tag their functions as immutable to get them to work. -- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: