Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
От | Böszörményi Zoltán |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C2308FD.1090300@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ECPG FETCH readahead (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Re: ECPG FETCH readahead |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, 2010-06-23 22:42 keltezéssel, Bruce Momjian írta: > Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we improved ECPG quite a lot in 9.0 because we worked and >> still working with an Informix to PostgreSQL migration project. >> >> We came across a pretty big performance problem that can be seen in >> every "naive" application that uses only FETCH 1, FETCH RELATIVE >> or FETCH ABSOLUTE. These are almost the only FETCH variations >> usable in Informix, i.e. it doesn't have the grammar for fetching N rows >> at once. Instead, the Client SDK libraries do caching themselves >> behind the scenes to reduce network turnaround time. >> > I assume our ecpg version supports>1 fetch values, even in Informix > mode. Does it make sense to add lots of code to our ecpg then? > I think, yes, it does make sense. Because we are talking about porting a whole lot of COBOL applications. The ESQL/C or ECPG connector was already written the Informix quirks in mind, so it fetches only one record at a time passing it to the application. And similar performance is expected from ECPG - which excpectation is not fulfilled currently because libecpg doesn't do the same caching as ESQL/C does. And FYI, I haven't added a whole lot of code, most of the code changes in the patch is execute.c refactoring. ECPGdo() was split into several functions, the new parts are still doing the same things. I can make the test case much smaller, I only needed to test crossing the readahead window boundary. This would also make the patch much smaller. And this readahead is not on by default, it's only activated by "ecpg -r fetch_readahead". Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: