Re: access method: are disk pages mandatory?
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: access method: are disk pages mandatory? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C222949.9090305@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | access method: are disk pages mandatory? (Leonardo F <m_lists@yahoo.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: access method: are disk pages mandatory?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 23/06/10 18:17, Leonardo F wrote: > in bufpage.h: > > "all blocks written out by an access method must be disk pages" > > but in > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/storage-page-layout.html > > "Actually, index access methods need not use this page format. All the > existing index methods do use this basic format, but the data kept on > index metapages usually doesn't follow the item layout rules." > > I'm not getting it: am I supposed to use the "disk page format" when > writing an index access method, or it's just a "good practice" because > it makes the handling easier? Given the docs it looks "recommended", > but the comment on the code sounds more "mandatory". It's recommened because it makes life easier. Even if you don't use the normal page format, I think you need to have the LSN at the beginning of the page. The rest is up to you. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: