Re: High Availability with Postgres
От | John R Pierce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: High Availability with Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C210966.7010601@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: High Availability with Postgres (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: High Availability with Postgres
Re: High Availability with Postgres |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 06/22/10 1:58 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote: > John R Pierce<pierce@hogranch.com> writes: > >> failure modes can >> include things like failing fans (which will be detected, resulting in a >> server shutdown if too many fail), power supply failure (redundant PSUs, but >> I've seen the power combining circuitry fail). Any of these sorts of >> failures will result in a failover without corrupting the data. >> >> and of course, intentional planned failovers to do OS maintenance... you >> patch the standby system, fail over to it and verify its good, then patch >> the other system. >> > Ah, I see the use case much better now, thank you. And I begin too see > how expensive reaching such a goal is, too. Going from "I can lose this > many transactions" to "No data lost, ever" is at that price, though. > yeah. generally when money is involved in the transactions, you gotta stick to the 'no committed data lost ever'. there's plenty of other use cases for that too.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: