Re: Aggressive autovacuuming ?
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Aggressive autovacuuming ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C1F54A2020000250003270A@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Aggressive autovacuuming ? (Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc> wrote: > My thought was that if I tuned autovacuum to be "really > aggressive" then I could get autovacuum to actually vacuum the > tuples before they get evicted from the OS cache thus effectively > "saving" the IO-overhead of vacuuming. Interesting concept. That might be a way to avoid the extra disk I/O to set hint bits, and then some. I haven't tried it, but I'm going to make a note to take a look when (if???) I get some free time. If you give it a try, please post the results. If you're I/O bound (rather than CPU bound) and you choose *extremely* aggressive settings, the multiple writes to pages *might* collapse in cache and significantly reduce I/O. I don't think I'd try it on a release prior to 8.4, however. Nor would I consider trying this in a production environment without a good set of tests. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: