Re: Need to increase performance of a query
От | Anne Rosset |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Need to increase performance of a query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C113E2F.6000305@collab.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Need to increase performance of a query (Anne Rosset <arosset@collab.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Need to increase performance of a query
Re: Need to increase performance of a query Re: Need to increase performance of a query |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Jochen Erwied wrote: > Thursday, June 10, 2010, 8:36:08 PM you wrote: > > >> psrdb=# (SELECT >> psrdb(# MAX(item_rank.rank) AS maxRank >> psrdb(# FROM >> psrdb(# item_rank item_rank >> psrdb(# WHERE >> psrdb(# item_rank.project_id='proj2783' >> psrdb(# AND item_rank.pf_id IS NULL >> psrdb(# >> psrdb(# ) >> psrdb-# ORDER BY >> psrdb-# maxRank DESC; >> > > Don't think it does really matter, but why do you sort a resultset > consisting of only one row? > > Sorry, I should have removed the ORDER by (the full query has a union). So without the ORDER by, here are the results: psrdb=# SELECT psrdb-# MAX(item_rank.rank) AS maxRank psrdb-# FROM psrdb-# item_rank item_rank psrdb-# WHERE psrdb-# item_rank.pf_id='plan1408'; maxrank ------------- 20504000000 (1 row) Time: 1.516 ms psrdb=# SELECT psrdb-# MAX(item_rank.rank) AS maxRank psrdb-# FROM psrdb-# item_rank item_rank psrdb-# WHERE psrdb-# item_rank.project_id='proj2783' psrdb-# AND item_rank.pf_id IS NULL; maxrank ------------- 20200000000 (1 row) Time: 13.177 ms Is there anything that can be done for the second one? Thanks, Anne
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: