Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
От | Jon Schewe |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4C094553.7040000@mtu.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL
Re: How filesystems matter with PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 6/4/10 9:33 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > On Friday 04 June 2010 16:25:30 Tom Lane wrote: > >> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: >> >>> On Friday 04 June 2010 14:17:35 Jon Schewe wrote: >>> >>>> XFS (logbufs=8): ~4 hours to finish >>>> ext4: ~1 hour 50 minutes to finish >>>> ext3: 15 minutes to finish >>>> ext3 on LVM: 15 minutes to finish >>>> >>> My guess is that some of the difference comes from barrier differences. >>> ext4 uses barriers by default, ext3 does not. >>> >> Or, to put it more clearly: the reason ext3 is fast is that it's unsafe. >> > Jon: To verify you can enable it via the barrier=1 option during mounting.. > > > First some details: Linux kernel 2.6.31 postgres version: 8.4.2 More test results: reiserfs: ~1 hour 50 minutes ext3 barrier=1: ~15 minutes ext4 nobarrier: ~15 minutes jfs: ~15 minutes -- Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe If you see an attachment named signature.asc, this is my digital signature. See http://www.gnupg.org for more information.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: