Re: [RFC] A tackle to the leaky VIEWs for RLS

(2010/06/01 18:08), Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 01/06/10 11:39, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>> Any operators eventually invokes a function
>> being correctly installed, but an assumption is that we can trust operators,
>> index access method, type input/output methods, conversions and so on, because
>> these features have to be installed by DBA (or initdb).
> 
> Operators can be created by regular users.
> 
Oops, I missed it. Indeed, operator function is not limited to C-language
functions, so regular users can create it.

Apart from the topic, does it seem to you reasonable direction to tackle to
the leaky VIEWs problem?

Thanks,
-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>