Re: Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable?
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BFC915E.7090202@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/25/2010 08:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: >> There is an open item "pg_controldata - machine readable?" in the list: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items > >> The proposal by Joe Conway is adding a new contib module. >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B959D7A.6010907@joeconway.com >> http://github.com/jconway/pg_controldata > >> Should we add the module to 9.0? > > No. This is a new feature that wasn't even under consideration, > let alone written, at the time of 9.0 feature freeze. It does not > get into either core or contrib this time around. Yup, agreed. That was why I put it on github instead of sending a patch to the list. It was also a quick and dirty hack -- maybe it could be cleaned up for 9.1, but I'm not sure there was consensus that it was really needed. Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: