Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BFBDC180200002500031A87@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> wrote: > Have you ever looked at one of those queries, that Londiste or > Slony issue against the provider DB in order to get all the log > data that has been committed between two snapshots? Is that really > the best you can think of? No, I admit I haven't. In fact, I was thinking primarily in terms of log-driven situations, like HS. What would be the best place for me to look to come up to speed on your use case? (I'm relatively sure that the issue isn't that there's no information to find, but that a sequential pass over all available information would take a *long* time.) I've been working through the issues on WAL-based replicas, and have some additional ideas and alternatives, but I'd like to see the "big picture", including trigger-based replication, before posting. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: