Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BEAFFA4.7050600@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes: > >> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié may 12 14:07:13 -0400 2010: >> >>> We could try to make this a supported build arrangement, but I'm >>> inclined to think that a cleaner solution is to split out the loadable >>> module as a separate contrib subdirectory. Thoughts? >>> > > >> Do you mean contrib/pg_upgrade/somelib? If so, +1. >> > > Hmm. I had been thinking the other way, but I'll see if that can be > made to work. > > > Not sure this will work on its own with the MSVC build system - I don't think it's set up for sub-modules. But we can finessee that if necessary, just as we make special provision for pgcrypto. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: