Re: no universally correct setting for fsync
От | Yeb Havinga |
---|---|
Тема | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BE90E95.6060100@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > >> The answer to this is: >> >> PostgreSQL.org recommends that this setting be left on at all >> times. Turning it off, may lead to data corruption. >> >> Anything else is circumstantial and based on knowledge and facts >> we don't have about environmental factors. >> > > Perhaps Josh's language for fsync could be modified to work here > (we're now talking about full_page_writes, for anyone who's lost > track): > > | it is only advisable to turn off fsync if you can easily recreate > | your entire database from external data. > > That covers bulk loads to an empty or just-backed-up database and > entirely redundant databases. Saying it should never be turned off > would tend to make one wonder why we have the setting at all. > Would the term "entirely redundant databases" include (synchronously) replicated databases? (ps: I did indeed lose track about whether this is about fsync or full_page_writes and did not get on the track again) regards, Yeb Havinga
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: