Re: Clustering features for upcoming developer meeting -- please claim yours!
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clustering features for upcoming developer meeting -- please claim yours! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BE874D7.90607@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Clustering features for upcoming developer meeting -- please claim yours! (Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Clustering features for upcoming
developer meeting -- please claim yours!
Re: Clustering features for upcoming developer meeting -- please claim yours! |
Список | pgsql-cluster-hackers |
On 5/10/2010 4:25 PM, Marko Kreen wrote: > AFAICS the "agreeable order" should take care of positioning: > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/ModificationTriggerGDQ#Suggestions_for_Implementation > > This combined with DML triggers that react to invalidate events (like > PgQ ones) should already work fine? > > Are there situations where such setup fails? > That explanation of an agreeable order only solves the problems of placing the DDL into the replication stream between transactions, possibly done by multiple clients. It does in no way address the problem of one single client executing a couple of updates, modifies the object, then continues with updates. In this case, there isn't even a transaction boundary at which the DDL happened on the master. And this one transaction could indeed alter the object several times. This means that a generalized data queue needs to have hooks, so that DDL triggers can inject their payload into it. Jan -- Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security. -- Benjamin Franklin
В списке pgsql-cluster-hackers по дате отправления: