Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BDCB669.6090201@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server |
Список | pgsql-general |
Scott Ribe wrote: > PG's locking scheme, MVCC, basically precludes certain specific optimizations that means a small number of very specificqueries don't perform as well, while at the same time it means that throughput with multiple simultaneous connectionsscales extremely well with multiple processors. > SQL Server uses MVCC too as of their 2005 release, implemented with row versioning similarly to Postgres. The main non-MVCC holdout at this point is DB2. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: