Re: Performance and Clustering
От | Ozz Nixon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance and Clustering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BD9B884.30104@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance and Clustering (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance and Clustering
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 4/29/10 12:42 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > Alban Hertroys wrote: >> The reason I'm asking is that Postgres doesn't perform at its best on >> Windows and I seriously wonder whether the OS would be able to handle >> a load like that at all (can Windows handle 4000 open sockets for >> example?). > > You have to go out of your way to even get >125 connections going on > Windows; see the very last entry at > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Running_%26_Installing_PostgreSQL_On_Native_Windows > > I design socket component suites for developers, on windows, with few registry tweaks, you are able to have over 50,000 live, hot sockets. On Linux 2.6 and later, I have yet to hit a serious limit. Performance wise, your focus will be poor memory paging, so make sure you have too much RAM, and nothing else running. O.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: