Re: Differential backup
От | Michael Tharp |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Differential backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BD6F592.7080404@partiallystapled.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Differential backup ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Differential backup
Re: Differential backup |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/27/2010 09:59 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote: > Under what circumstances would PostgreSQL > modify a file without changing the "last modified" timestamp or the > file size? Do all OSes have sub-second precision mtimes? Because otherwise I could see a scenario such at this: * File is modified * Backup inspects and copies the file in the same second * File is modified again in the same second, so the mtime doesn't change * Backup is run again some time later and sees that the mtime has not changed Even with microsecond precision this kind of scenario makes me squidgy, especially if some OSes decide that skipping frequent mtime updates is OK. Florian's point about clock changes is also very relevant. Since Postgres has the capability to give a better answer about what is in the file, it would be best to use that. -- m. tharp
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: