Re: global temporary tables
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: global temporary tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BD4B44B.6030406@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | global temporary tables (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: global temporary tables
Re: global temporary tables |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert, > (1). What I *think* it is supposed to mean is that the table is a > permanent object which is "globally" visible - that is, it's part of > some non-temp schema like public or $user and it's column definitions > etc. are visible to all backends - and it's not automatically removed > on commit, backend exit, etc. - but the *contents* of the table are > temporary and backend-local, so that each new backend initially sees > it as empty and can then insert, update, and delete data independently > of what any other backend does. While closer to the standard, the above definition is a lot less useful than what I believe a lot of people want, which is a table which is globally visible, but has no durability; that is, it does not get WAL-logged or recovered on restart. Certainly this latter definition would be far more useful to support materialized views. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: