Re: Int64GetDatum
От | John R Pierce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Int64GetDatum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BC96B2C.5050402@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Int64GetDatum (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Int64GetDatum
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > No, but trying to build against a non-self-consistent set of files is > bad. You really need a pg_config.h that matches the original build of > the server, and you haven't got that. I think Greg's point is that > trying to reverse-engineer that file is considerably more risky than > building your own packages from scratch. > and once again totally concurring with what you are saying... for laughs, I went ahead and tweaked the fields in a copy of the 32bit pg_config.h that I suspected were obviously wrong, and rebuilt my module against that, and it got through most of the pl/java test suite. so I know I'm on the right track, I just need the right pg_config.h from Bjorn and all will be well with my world.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: