Re: Int64GetDatum
От | John R Pierce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Int64GetDatum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BC7F979.3040408@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Int64GetDatum (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Int64GetDatum
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> writes: > >> I have compiled some C (pljava.c) for solaris sparc 64 bit, setup the >> LD_LIBRARY_PATH so postgres can find it, and try and load it. >> > > >> me=# CREATE FUNCTION sqlj.java_call_handler() RETURNS language_handler >> AS 'pljava' LANGUAGE C; >> ERROR: could not load library "/opt/mystuff/pljava/pljava.so": ld.so.1: >> postgres: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/mystuff/pljava/pljava.so: >> symbol Int64GetDatum: referenced symbol not found >> > > This appears to be a consequence of 32-vs-64-bit confusion, ie, your > pljava.so was built assuming !USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL but the backend was > built with that symbol defined. Are you still trying to hack your > way to a solution without making configure run properly? Because > this is just about the sort of pain I'd expect from that "shortcut". > Using the include files provided with the 64bit version is giving me the wrong Float8 type, yes, as they are the 32bit include files. I need to build pl/java to run against the binary release of Postgres for largely political/corporate reasons. this is to be installable as an addon to an existing large/complex database deployment. If I build my own ./configure and compile my own postgres binary and use that to build this, what are the odds the module I compile will work with the released binary? If I had the correct include files for the binary release, I would not be having this problem.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: