Re: pl/java status
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pl/java status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BC55599.5060501@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pl/java status (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pl/java status
Re: pl/java status |
Список | pgsql-general |
John R Pierce wrote: > is pl/java kind of dead? I don't see much activity since years ago. I've been a bit worried about that myself. With OpenJDK and a GPL java, it makes a lot of sense to make Java a first-class PL in PostgreSQL. There's a fair bit of activity from Java-using users, and there's not really much reason Java should be restricted to the client side when the same language can work well server-side too. Not to mention all those Oracle users out there who're hooked on the stuff. Of course, Java is extremely thread-happy and PostgreSQL is extremely *not*, so perhaps there are reasons it doesn't seem to see much work. If it's anything like working on an embedded Python interpreter... -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: