Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
От | Jesper Krogh |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BBECA06.40602@krogh.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID (Dave Crooke <dcrooke@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 2010-04-08 05:44, Dave Crooke wrote: > For a card level RAID controller, I am a big fan of the LSI 8888, which is > available in a PCIe riser form factor for blade / 1U servers, and comes with > 0.5GB of battery backed cache. Full Linux support including mainline kernel > drivers and command line config tools. Was using these with SAS expanders > and 48x 1TB SATA-300 spindles per card, and it was pretty (adjective) quick > for a card-based system ... comparable with a small FC-AL EMC Clariion CX3 > series in fact, just without the redundancy. > Can someone shed "simple" light on an extremely simple question. How do you physicallly get 48 drives attached to an LSI that claims to only have 2 internal and 2 external ports? (the controller claims to support up to 240 drives). I'm currently looking at getting a server with space for 8 x 512GB SSDs running raid5 (or 6) and are looking for an well performing controller with BBWC for the setup. So I was looking for something like the LSI888ELP. -- Jesper
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: