Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BBD740C.7020308@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 3ware vs. MegaRAID
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Scott Carey wrote: > * Change the linux 'readahead' block device parameter to at least 4MB (8192, see blockdev --setra) -- I don't know if thereis a FreeBSD equivalent. > I haven't tested them, but 3ware gives suggestions at http://www.3ware.com/kb/Article.aspx?id=14852 for tuning their cards properly under FreeBSD. You cannot get good sequential read performance from 3ware's cards without doing something about this at the OS level; the read-ahead on the card itself is minimal and certainly a bottleneck. As for your comments about drives being faster at the front than the end, the zcav tool that comes with bonnie++ is a good way to plot that out, rather than having to split partitions up and do a bunch of manual testing. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: