Re: Proposal: Add JSON support
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Add JSON support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BBAC00B.4000801@pjmodos.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Add JSON support (Joseph Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dne 6.4.2010 5:50, Joseph Adams napsal(a): > Another JSON strictness issue: the JSON standard ( > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt ) states that JSON text can only > be an array or object. However, my implementation currently accepts > any valid value. Thus, '3', '"hello"', 'true', 'false', and 'null' > are all accepted by my implementation, but are not strictly JSON text. > The question is: should the JSON datatype accept atomic values (those > that aren't arrays or objects) as valid JSON? > Not really sure about this myself, but keep in mind that NULL has special meaning in SQL. > Also, should we go even further and accept key:value pairs by themselves? : > > '"key":"value"'::JSON > > No, especially considering that '{"key":"value"}' is a valid JSON value. > I improved my JSON library. It now only accepts strict, UTF-8 encoded > JSON values (that is, objects, arrays, strings, numbers, true, false, > and null). > Just a note, but PostgreSQL has some UTF-8 validation code, you might want to look at it maybe, at least once you start the actual integration into core, so that you are not reinventing too many wheels. I can see how your own code is good thing for general library which this can (and I am sure will be) used as, but for the datatype itself, it might be better idea to use what's already there, unless it's somehow incompatible of course. -- Regards Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: