Re: Using high speed swap to improve performance?
От | Arjen van der Meijden |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using high speed swap to improve performance? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BB64B24.2030001@tweakers.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Using high speed swap to improve performance? (Christiaan Willemsen <cwillemsen@technocon.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
What about FreeBSD with ZFS? I have no idea which features they support and which not, but it at least is a bit more free than Solaris and still offers that very nice file system. Best regards, Arjen On 2-4-2010 21:15 Christiaan Willemsen wrote: > Hi there, > > About a year ago we setup a machine with sixteen 15k disk spindles on > Solaris using ZFS. Now that Oracle has taken Sun, and is closing up > Solaris, we want to move away (we are more familiar with Linux anyway). > > So the plan is to move to Linux and put the data on a SAN using iSCSI > (two or four network interfaces). This however leaves us with with 16 > very nice disks dooing nothing. Sound like a wast of time. If we were to > use Solaris, ZFS would have a solution: use it as L2ARC. But there is no > Linux filesystem with those features (ZFS on fuse it not really an option). > > So I was thinking: Why not make a big fat array using 14 disks (raid 1, > 10 or 5), and make this a big and fast swap disk. Latency will be lower > than the SAN can provide, and throughput will also be better, and it > will relief the SAN from a lot of read iops. > > So I could create a 1TB swap disk, and put it onto the OS next to the > 64GB of memory. Then I can set Postgres to use more than the RAM size so > it will start swapping. It would appear to postgres that the complete > database will fit into memory. The question is: will this do any good? > And if so: what will happen? > > Kind regards, > > Christiaan >
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: