Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BB4EAB4.3020904@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements
Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The thing is, when dealing with new features, we reduce our overall > maintenance burden if we get it right the first time. Obviously it's > too late for major changes, but minor adjustments to maintain the POLA > seem like exactly what we SHOULD be doing right now. Oh, I agree. Since we have a separate WALSender limit, it seems counter-intuitive and difficult-to-admin to have the WALSenders also limited by superuser_connections. They should be their own separate connection pool, just like the other "background" processes. However, if this was somehow infeasible, it wouldn't be hard to document. That's all. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: