Re: Running Windows on a Mac partition
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Running Windows on a Mac partition |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BB35EF3.4020806@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Running Windows on a Mac partition (Joshua Berry <yoberi@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 31/03/2010 10:27 PM, Joshua Berry wrote: > My vote would be to follow Craig Ringer's advice to run the pg server in > a virtual machine. I'd choose something like vmware/fusion or if you > want license free options, I think they exist that can run hosts on > win32 and BSD/MacOS. > > But if you wanted to avoid dual booting altogether and > parallels/fusion/whatever can run you win32 apps well enough, I'd run > the server on the Mac side and let the win apps connect to it via the > virtual network adapters. This is how I've run things on my Mac with > decent results. Yeah. Not having Pg in a VM is better, given the choice. It's hard to say how trustworthy fsync() behaviour on various VMs is, for one thing. I'd still use a VM over ntfs-on-mac or hfs+-on-windows, but running it natively and using it over tcp/ip is always going to be preferable if you can. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: