Re: Performance regarding LIKE searches
От | Andy Colson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance regarding LIKE searches |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BB0E504.30300@squeakycode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance regarding LIKE searches (randalls@bioinfo.wsu.edu) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 3/29/2010 12:23 PM, randalls@bioinfo.wsu.edu wrote: > Tom, > > We are using perl 5.10 with postgresql DBD. Can you point me in the right direction in terms of unamed and named preparedstatements? > > Thanks, > > Randall Svancara > Systems Administrator/DBA/Developer > Main Bioinformatics Laboratory > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Lane"<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > To: randalls@bioinfo.wsu.edu > Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 10:00:03 AM > Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Performance regarding LIKE searches > > randalls@bioinfo.wsu.edu writes: >> I can see I am hitting an index using an index that I created using the varchar_pattern_ops setting. This is very fastand performs like I would expect. However, when my application, GBrowse, access the database, I see in my slow querylog this: > >> 2010-03-29 09:34:38.083 PDT,"gdr_gbrowse_live","gdr_gbrowse_live",11649,"10.0.0.235:59043",4bb0399d.2d81,8,"SELECT",2010-03-2822:24:45 PDT,4/118607,0,LOG,00000,"duration:21467.467 ms execute dbdpg_p25965_9: SELECT f.id,f.object,f.typeid,f.seqid,f.start,f.end,f.strand >> FROM feature as f, name as n >> WHERE (n.id=f.id AND lower(n.name) LIKE $1) > >> ","parameters: $1 = 'Scaffold:scaffold\_163:1000..1199%'",,,,,,, > >> GBrowse is a perl based application. Looking at the duration for this query is around 21 seconds. That is a bit long. Does anyone have any ideas why the query duration is so different? > > You're not going to get an index optimization when the LIKE pattern > isn't a constant (and left-anchored, but this is). > > It is possible to get the planner to treat a query parameter as a > constant (implying a re-plan on each execution instead of having a > cached plan). I believe what you have to do at the moment is use > unnamed rather than named prepared statements. The practicality of > this would depend a lot on your client-side software stack, which > you didn't mention. > > regards, tom lane > I'm just going to guess, but DBD::Pg can do "real prepare" or "fake prepare". It does "real" by default. Try setting: $dbh->{pg_server_prepare} = 0; before you prepare/run that statement and see if it makes a difference. http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-Pg/Pg.pm#prepare -Andy
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: