Re: seqential vs random io
От | Anjan Dave |
---|---|
Тема | Re: seqential vs random io |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BAFBB6B9CC46F41B2AD7D9F4BBAF785098A4B@vt-pe2550-001.vantage.vantage.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | seqential vs random io ("David Parker" <dparker@tazznetworks.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
I would tell him to go for the random, which is what most DBs would be by nature. What you need to understand will be thecache parameters, read/write cache amount, and stripe size, depending on your controller type and whatever it defaultsto on these things. Thanks, Anjan -----Original Message----- From: David Parker [mailto:dparker@tazznetworks.com] Sent: Mon 5/23/2005 4:58 PM To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Cc: Subject: [PERFORM] seqential vs random io I just got a question from one our QA guys who is configuring a RAID 10 disk that is destined to hold a postgresql database.The disk configuration procedure is asking him if he wants to optimize for sequential or random access. My firstthought is that random is what we would want, but then I started wondering if it's not that simple, and my knowledgeof stuff at the hardware level is, well, limited..... If it were your QA guy, what would you tell him? - DAP ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Parker Tazz Networks (401) 709-5130
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: