Re: 9.0 release notes done
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.0 release notes done |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BA7DE8C.4080808@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.0 release notes done (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.0 release notes done
Re: 9.0 release notes done Re: 9.0 release notes done |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/22/10 7:46 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I do not require them to submit SGML; just some format where I can > identify the lines that changed. I can do the same for the release > notes. I have to check the diffs anyway so manually merging in the > changes isn't a problem. So there are 2 large problems I have with the SGML version, let's see if we can deal with them separately: (1) re-arranging and regrouping the items: the stuff in the release notes should end up in 7-8 clear categories, with items arranged in descending order by importance. SGML+CVS makes this a task which cannot be done collaboratively. (2) Seeing my edits. There's no edit-->view-->edit cycle with the SGML, and it's really hard to check grammar and languge ... let alone compare stuff to the alphas ... in raw SGML. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: