Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BA626EE.302@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | proposal: more practical view on function's source code (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code
Re: proposal: more practical view on function's source code |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 21/03/2010 8:03 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hello > > Current form of function detail isn't too practical (see screenshot 1) > > we can move source code to separate area (maybe we can add rownumbers) > > see screenshot 2 (it is only mockup, real implementation can be more > inteligent in rows numbering) Ideally, the output of the source listing could be used as input to CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION without excessive massaging. Those line number prefixes make it hard to grab the output of \df+ and do something useful with it. Sure, vim's column-edit takes care of them quickly enough, but it's still a pain, and if the output format is to be changed it might be nice to see it change in a way that makes it easier to re-use that source listing. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: