Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4BA37FD5.9000404@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas escribió: > >> When recovery reaches an invalid WAL record, typically caused by a >> half-written WAL file, it closes the file and moves to the next source. >> If an error is found in a file restored from archive or in a portion >> just streamed from master, however, a PANIC is thrown, because it's not >> expected to have errors in the archive or in the master. > > Hmm, I think I've heard that tools like walmgr do incremental copies of > the current WAL segment to the archive. Doesn't this change break that? Hmm, you could have a restore_command that checks the size before restoring to make it still work. I note that pg_standby does that, but of course you can't use pg_standby with the built-in standby mode. Or maybe we should modify the built-in standby mode to handle partial files coming from restore_command by not throwing an error but recovering to the end of the partial file, and then retrying restore_command again with the same filename until the whole file is recovered (or the missing WAL is received through other means, ie. streaming replication). -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: