Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B960BD4020000250002FA5D@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics ("Pierre C" <lists@peufeu.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
"Pierre C" <lists@peufeu.com> wrote: > Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I'm curious what you feel those weaknesses are. > > Handling lots of small files, especially deleting them, is really > slow on XFS. > Databases don't care about that. I know of at least one exception to that -- when we upgraded and got a newer version of the kernel where XFS has write barriers on by default, some database transactions which were creating and dropping temporary tables in a loop became orders of magnitude slower. Now, that was a silly approach to getting the data that was needed and I helped them rework the transactions, but something which had worked acceptably suddenly didn't anymore. Since we have a BBU hardware RAID controller, we can turn off write barriers safely, at least according to this page: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q._Should_barriers_be_enabled_with_storage_which_has_a_persistent_write_cache.3F This reduces the penalty for creating and deleting lots of small files. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: