Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks?
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B908248.4090802@postnewspapers.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks? ("Kevin Flanagan" <kevin-f@linkprior.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding
hacks?
Re: Visual Studio 2005, C-language function - avoiding hacks? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Flanagan wrote: > the compiler > complained about various missing include files, starting with > ‘libintl.h’. Having read the post at > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2009-03/msg00332.php I > created an empty libint.h in an include dir NFI why Pg for win32 doesn't bundle a copy of the libintl it was built against. I should poke the EDB guys about it, actually. > along with a bunch of other > empty dummy files that were expected: netdb.h, pwd.h, netinet/in.h and > arpa/inet.h. Those I wouldn't expect to be included if you're building for win32. Are you sure you're building with the win32 configuration? > The code then compiles ok, but gives ‘inconsistent dll linkage’ on the > line with PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 and the one with PG_MODULE_MAGIC. This would suggest that the macros that insert appropriate __declspec(dllimport) and __declspec(dllexport) attributes aren't being triggered - so again, it makes me wonder if Pg knows it's building for win32. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: