Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
От | Yeb Havinga |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B8D7A6C.3010304@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics (Francisco Reyes <lists@stringsutils.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Francisco Reyes wrote: > Anyone has any experience doing analytics with postgres. In particular > if 10K rpm drives are good enough vs using 15K rpm, over 24 drives. > Price difference is $3,000. > > Rarely ever have more than 2 or 3 connections to the machine. > > So far from what I have seen throughput is more important than TPS for > the queries we do. Usually we end up doing sequential scans to do > summaries/aggregates. > With 24 drives it'll probably be the controller that is the limiting factor of bandwidth. Our HP SAN controller with 28 15K drives delivers 170MB/s at maximum with raid 0 and about 155MB/s with raid 1+0. So I'd go for the 10K drives and put the saved money towards the controller (or maybe more than one controller). regards, Yeb Havinga
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: