Re: [ADMIN] The OS Command for pg_hotbackup -- Use lvmsnapshot instead of tar cvzf
От | Chander Ganesan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ADMIN] The OS Command for pg_hotbackup -- Use lvmsnapshot instead of tar cvzf |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B8D545D.80405@otg-nc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | The OS Command for pg_hotbackup -- Use lvmsnapshot instead of tar cvzf ("Arnold, Sandra" <ArnoldS@osti.gov>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Arnold, Sandra wrote: > I am currently using the pg_hotbackup Perl script to backup my > production PostgreSQL database. However, the next production database > is going to be close to a terrabyte in size. We feel that a tar cvzf > command is not the correct OS backup solution to use. Instead we > would like to use lvmsnapshot. Is anyone using the pg_hotbackup > script but instead of the tar cvzf OS command are they using lvmsnapshot? I believe that if you take an LVM snapshot and the change size exceeds the snapshot size (a configurable value) then the snapshot gets released, so you might want to be careful with this solution (I don't know how much data you accumulate, or how fast you accumulate it, or if that rate changes, etc.). You'll also need to ensure that you snapshot any and all tablespaces (if you use pg_start_backup() first the snapshots need not be simultaneous, but they still must be done). You might consider using rsync instead, it should be a lot faster than tar, and doesn't have the same downside as using snapshots. You'll also find that it is fairly widely used in the PostgreSQL community. -- Chander Ganesan Open Technology Group, Inc. One Copley Parkway, Suite 210 Morrisville, NC 27560 919-463-0999/877-258-8987 http://www.otg-nc.com Expert PostgreSQL, Python, PHP, and other open source training.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: