Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B88A8D3.2070406@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication
integration
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Aidan Van Dyk wrote: > Would we (ya, the royal we) be willing to say that if you want the > benifit of removing the MVCC overhead of long-running queries you need > to run PITR backup/archive recovery, and if you want SR, you get a > closed-loop master-follows-save-xmin behaviour? > To turn that question around a little, I think it's reasonable to say that closed-loop master-follows-slave-xmin behavior is only practical to consider implementing with SR--and even there, it should be optional rather than required until there's more field experience on the whole thing. Whether it's the default or not could take a bit of debate to sort out too. If you think of it in those terms, the idea that "you need to run PITR backup/archive recovery" to not get that behavior isn't an important distinction anymore. If you run SR with the option enabled you could get it, any other setup and you won't. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: