Re: pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest
От | Stefan Kaltenbrunner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B8544F4.2000804@kaltenbrunner.cc обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton
mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:03 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner >> <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote: >>> Bruce Momjian wrote: >>>> Log Message: >>>> ----------- >>>> Remove pre-7.4 documentaiton mentions, now that 8.0 is the oldest >>>> supported release. >>> per http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Release_Support_Policy 7.4 is >>> still supported for a few months to come (and will be EOL'd together with >>> 8.0). I'm also not really sure why we need to change stuff like that, this >>> kind of information might still be useful for somebody trying to upgrade >>> from an unsupported release to a supported one. >> Yeah. > > Well, the documentation still exists in the old releases, even 8.4. The > big question is how much back-version information we should keep in our > docs, and does it make sense to keep paragraphs around that are only > meaningful to < 1% of people reading it. Some people are saying keep > more, some are saying keep less, so I am betting I have hit the proper > balance. ;-) Well even if it is useful information for only 1% of our readers (which given the access stats on the html logs is a HUGE number) and we don't have any real maintenance overhead with keeping it (which I kinda doubt we have). And just from looking at some of the hunks in more detail I think we are actually removing fairly reasonable information (especially if we are talking stuff like behaviour changes) :/ Stefan
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: