Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B7D4B69.3020900@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | A thought: should we run pgindent now? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Which leads me to the thought that rather than postponing running > pgindent until late beta, maybe we should run it *now*, and get the > bulk of its work done for the new code in 9.0. Then people would have > a solid base to patch against, rather than having to expect a major > merge hassle at the end of beta. > > > > > (BTW, by "now" I don't mean *today* --- seems better to wait till > alpha4 has been wrapped. But as soon as that's done.) > > I have a TODO on fixing some of the typedef finding. But I can generate an up to date version of the list Bruce last used in a day or two, and then get this better whacked into shape for another run at the more traditional time. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: