On 17/02/10 18:30, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 17, 2010, at 4:28 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
>> Umm, perhaps F->funcname(@args), or PG->funcname(@args), or ... ?
>>
>> Anyone got any better suggestions?
>
> PG is good. Or maybe DB?
It's a module whose only use is embedded in a DB called PG - not sure
those carry any extra info. It also treads on the toes of
"PG->not_a_function" should such a beast be needed.
I like "F->funcname" or "FN->funcname" myself.
-- Richard Huxton Archonet Ltd