Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B790A16.2080903@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch (Leonardo F <m_lists@yahoo.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: [FWD] About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Leonardo F wrote: > Could at least the message: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg00766.php > be added to the TODO page, under > "Improve CLUSTER performance by sorting to reduce > random I/O" ? > It would be sad if the patch got lost... You should read http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch and follow the instructions there. As outlined in the "Submission timing" section, you're asking about something during the wrong time to be doing so--that's why you're not getting any real feedback. Add your patch to the next CommitFest by linking to your message at https://commitfest.postgresql.org/ and it won't get lost--it will get assigned a reviewer at the time when the time comes to look at completely new patches again. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: