Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce the chatter to the log when starting a standby server.
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce the chatter to the log when starting a standby server. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B757358.1020007@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce the chatter to the log when starting a standby server. (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce the chatter to the log
when starting a standby server.
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Reduce the chatter to the log when starting a standby server. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote: > Furthermore, if you're wanting to use pg_standby, you might be > forgiven for thinking that you should set standby_mode = on; but in > fact that's exactly the wrong thing to do. Yeah, I think that's the main weakness of the name "standby_mode". It's pretty descriptive otherwise, we call that mode of operation "standby" everywhere, and always have. I'm not sure I dare to say this out loud after Simon's previous outburst, but removing or renaming pg_standby would help with that... > One possibility that occurs to me is that we could call it something > like integrated_standby; but I'm not attached to that. Anything with the word 'standby' in it suffers from the same problem, maybe not as badly but still. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: