Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
От | Andrew Chernow |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B7409B2.9010007@esilo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>> ISTM that the default behavior should be keep alives disabled, as it is >>> now, and those wanting it can just set it in their apps: >>> >>> setsockopt(PQsocket(conn), SOL_SOCKET, SO_KEEPALIVE, ...) >> I disagree. I have clients who have problems with leftover client connections >> due to server host failures. They do not write apps in C. For a non-default >> change to be effective we would need to have all the client drivers, eg JDBC, >> psycopg, DBD-DBI, and the apps like psql make changes to turn it on. Adding >> this option as a non-default will not really help. > > Yes, that's definitely the use-case. PQsocket() will work fine for C apps only. > > But it should work fine as an option, no? As long as you can specify > it on the connection string - I don't think there are any interfaces > that won't take a connection string? > Perl and python appear to have the same abilities as C. I don't use either of these drivers but I *think* the below would work: DBD:DBI setsockopt($dbh->pg_socket(), ...); psycopg conn.cursor().socket().setsockopt(...); Although, I think Dave's comments have made me change my mind about this patch. Looks like it serves a good purpose. Thatsaid, there is no guarentee the driver will implement the new feature ... JDBC seems to lack the ability to get the backing Socket object but java can set socket options. Maybe a JDBC kong fu master knows how to do this. -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC every bit counts http://www.esilo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: