Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
От | Kevin Grittner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B73DB9F020000250002F1AE@gw.wicourts.gov обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > I've sometimes wondered why keepalives aren't the default for all > TCP connections. They seem like they're usually a Good Thing > (TM), but I wonder if we can think of any situations where someone > might not want them? I think it's insane not to use them at all, but there are valid use cases for different timings. Personally, I'd be happy to see a default of sending them if a connection is idle for two minutes, but those people who create 2000 lightly used connections to the database might feel differently. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: