Re: Memory Usage and OpenBSD
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Memory Usage and OpenBSD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B73A1A9.7050002@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Memory Usage and OpenBSD (Jeff Ross <jross@wykids.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Memory Usage and OpenBSD
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Jeff Ross wrote: > pgbench is run with this: > pgbench -h varley.openvistas.net -U _postgresql -t 20000 -c $SCALE pgbench > with scale starting at 10 and then incrementing by 10. I call it > three times for each scale. I've turned on logging to 'all' to try > and help figure out where the system panics, so that may lower the TPS > somewhat but I have not been very favorably impressed with the speed > of these U320 15K disks in RAID10 yet. "-c" sets the number of clients active at once. pgbench has a database scale option when you're initializing, "-s", that sets how many records are in the tables, and therefore how large the database is. If you don't set the scale to a larger number, so that "-c" > "-s", you'll get bad performance results. The way you're saying scale but changing the client numbers is a little confusing. I can't comment how whether yours are good or bad numbers without knowing the actual database scale number. When reporting a pgbench result, it's handy to include the complete output from one of the runs, just so people can see exactly what test was run. After that you can just show the TPS values. Showing the command used to initialize the pgbench database can also be helpful. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: