Re: Multiple buffer cache?
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multiple buffer cache? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B6DFB1F.90807@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Multiple buffer cache? ("Bret S. Lambert" <bret.lambert@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Bret S. Lambert wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 02:44:32PM +0100, C?dric Villemain wrote: > >> I am working on pgfincore which allow in some way to prepare buffer cache. >> You need pg > 8.4 and linux (probably working with bsd too) >> > > Why do something with a non-portable interface? Most OSes support > coherently mmap(2)'ing disk blocks into memory; in fact, I'm somewhat > taken aback that the postgres buffer cache isn't implemented in that > manner, but I'm willing to give the devs credit for having not done > so for good reasons. > First off, Cedric's work is using a fairly portable interface: mincore http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/mincore.2.html combined with clever bits of mmap. Two useful introductions to this are are http://www.usenix.org/events/lisa07/tech/plonka.html and http://www.kennygorman.com/wordpress/?p=246 As for why not use mmap in the first place, this is a long running debate. See http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Miscellaneous_Performance for a quick intro to the issues involved. There are portability, database consistency, and code complexity issues around such a change, and the practical benefit of the change is not so obvious as to make hurdling those seem a priority. Plenty of easier changes around with completely unambiguous benefits to work on instead. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: