Re: warn in plperl logs as... NOTICE??

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>   
>> Jim Nasby wrote:
>>     
>>> Why does warn; in plperl log as NOTICE in Postgres?
>>>       
>
>   
>> Where would you like the warning to go? This has been this way for 
>> nearly 5 years, it's not new (and before that the warning didn't go 
>> anywhere).
>>     
>
> I think he's suggesting that it ought to translate as elog(WARNING)
> not elog(NOTICE).
>
>             
>   

*shrug* I don't have a strong opinion about it, and it's pretty easy to 
change, if there's a consensus we should. I have certainly found over 
the years that perl warnings from some modules can be annoyingly 
verbose, which is probably why the original patch didn't make them have 
a higher level in Postgres. If this were a big issue we'd have surely 
heard about it before now - there are plenty of plperl users out there.

cheers

andrew