Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
От | David E. Wheeler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B50CE5F-AC76-44D9-9FE4-B7E8783310AA@kineticode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable? ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Could regexp_matches be immutable?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:40 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> Ooh, yeah, dunno how I missed that. >> >> I think we're probably stuck in 8.4, but we should fix it going >> forward. Would you make a quick check if any of the other citext >> functions have the same bug? > > I've fixed it in my [version for 8.3](https://svn.kineticode.com/citext/trunk > ). Is there a straight-foward way to check such a thing > programmatically, with a query perhaps? Or should I just put aside > an hour to do an audit? FWIW, I think that this is a bug, and that the variation from the text version will be unexpected. I recommend fixing it for 8.4.2. Best, David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: