Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4B4D78B2.30600@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server (Eduardo Piombino <drakorg@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my
server
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Eduardo Piombino wrote: > Postgres version: 8.2.4, with all defaults, except DateStyle and TimeZone. Ugh...there are several features in PostgreSQL 8.3 and later specifically to address the sort of issue you're running into. If you want to get good write performance out of this system, you may need to upgrade to at least that version. It's impossible to resolve several of the common problems in write operations being too intense using any 8.2 version. > The final effect was that the server went non-responsive, for all > matters, not even the TaskManager would come up when i hit > CTRL-ALT-DEL, and of course, every client would suffer horrific (+20 > secs) for the simplest operations like SELECT NOW(); The thing that you have to realize is that altering a table is basically making a new copy of that table, which is a really heavy amount of writing. It's quite easy for an I/O heavy operation like that to fill up a lot of RAM with data to be written out, and when the database periodically needs to force all that data out to disk the whole system grinds to a halt when it happens. There's no way I'm aware of to throttle that writing down to a reasonable amount under Windows either, to achieve your goal of just making the ALTER run using less resources. Some reading: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Tuning_Your_PostgreSQL_Server goes over basic tuning of the database server. If you haven't already increased the checkpoint_segments parameters of your system, that's the first thing to try--increase it *a lot* (32 or more, default is 3) because it can really help with this problem. A moderate increase to shared_buffers is in order too; since you're on Windows, increasing it to 256MB is a reasonable change. The rest of the changes in there aren't likely to help out with this specific problem. http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/chkp-bgw-83.htm : covers the most likely cause of the issue you're running into. Unfortunately, most of the solutions you'll see there are things changed in 8.3. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: